Wikileaks is
NOT Journalism
Fox News is NOT Accurate
and Other Things
There were a
lot of items in the news this week that I could write about, but three stand
out. The arrest of Julian Assange, Fox News distorting poll results, and the
President’s attack on “sanctuary cities.” They are all troublesome. So, let’s
take a look:
Sorry, Julian
Assange. You do NOT get to hide behind the First Amendment. The arrest of the Wikileaks founder this past
week in London has presented many questions. And it has sparked some debate among
journalists on whether or not they should be defending his actions.
What did he allegedly do? Well, first, in a separate case, he could face rape charges in
Sweden now that he has left the protection of the Ecuadorian Embassy in London. He had been holed up there for the last seven years. But the main charge in the United States,
which had been pushing both Ecuador and the U.K. for the arrest, was Wikileaks' distribution of sensitive military information that had been stolen by a
hacker.
Bottom line,
journalists in a free society like the United States do NOT steal. On occasion,
like the Pentagon Papers case in 1971, they do get ahold of stolen material
from other sources and then debate whether to print or broadcast it. Then they consider the impact. Is the
information accurate?
Does publishing the
information serve the public interest?
Does publishing the
information serve the public interest?
Assange used
Wikileaks to disclose classified material obtained from former Army
Intelligence Analyst Chelsea Manning. She was later convicted at a court martial for
violating the Espionage Act. She spent seven years in prison before her 35-year
sentence was commuted by President Obama.
Had Wikileaks
just published the information, like the New York Times and Washington Post did
in the Pentagon Papers case, Assange would probably not be facing charges
today. But the government says he actually encouraged Manning to send more
material that Wikileaks knew was stolen and helped her hack into military
computers to get it. That is stepping
over a line that legitimate journalists should not and do not cross.
The courts have ruled that journalists may
not break the law in an effort to obtain such materials, and it has rarely
happened. To be clear, doing so would also violate the spirit of the ethics
codes of both the Radio and Television Digital News Association and the Society
of Professional Journalists, though stealing is not specifically mentioned. Those professional groups have no authority over journalists, but they do set the tone, and most respectable news organizations adhere to these rules.
It could be
argued that it may be necessary to break the law in order to expose government
corruption or covert operations that might also violate the law. But that is
not what this case is about. If the government is correct, and it still must be
proven in court, Assange, who is not an American Citizen, encouraged a member of the United States armed services
to betray her country. That is not something journalists should be doing.
Of note, Manning is back in jail now for
refusing to testify to a Grand Jury that is investigating Wikileaks. It may take some time for this to play
out in the courts, and any decision will be studied and talked about for
decades, just like the Pentagon Papers case. Assange, meanwhile, faces extradition from Great Britain to the United States.
Also of
note this week, a big faux pas at Fox News.
The actual
poll (link below) shows the President’s UNFAVORABLE rating remains steady at
55%, while 59% of those polled worried about an economic downturn. I would like to think that
somebody just misinterpreted the results, but at Fox News where mistakes are
frequent and bias is evident, I just don’t think so.
And that may
explain this graphic, which Fox News initially put up and quickly took down when
show host Howie Kurtz actually saw what it said. Not a mistake, he told the
media later, just out of context at the time.
I think this poll, conducted by Monmouth University, is about right.
And finally, this week a bizarre threat from the President of the United States. Mr. Trump has suggested that asylum seekers and others who have been detained at our southern border for illegally crossing, should now be sent to those cities in the U.S. which have declared themselves “Sanctuary Cities.” Chief among them is our historical long-term melting pot Port of entry, New York City. Mayor Bill Deblasio said his city “will always be the ultimate city of immigrants –the President's empty threats won’t change that.” The Big Apple’s Mayor said the policy was rooted in cruelty, but one of the city’s tabloid newspapers, the Daily News, probably expressed it better with this front page:
Just another week passes in Donald Trump’s America.
(My book "The Campaign" can be purchased on line at Amazon.com, BN.com or hanksilverbergbooks.com. Or send me an email at HankSilverberg@gmail.com to find out how to get a reduced price signed copy)
Comments
Post a Comment
Reactive comments are welcome. Please keep it civil. Any direct attack on the blogger or those who post is not welcome and will be deleted.